Recently, I had the pleasure of exchanging ideas with Frederic Neyrat. Over on Environment and Planning D’s Society and Space blog where you can read the full interview. We discuss eco-politics, political imaginaries, and the Anthropocene. If I may say so, it’s well worth a read.
Progress in Human Geography recently published the forum that Harlan Morehouse and I edited titled “After the Anthropocene: Politics and geographic inquiry for a new epoch”. The participants are frequent contributors to our Geocritique blog and include Simon Dalby, Jessi Lehman, Sara Nelson, Rory Rowan, Stephanie Wakefield, and Kathryn Yusoff. You can access (with subscription) the forum here.
Crutzen and Stoermer’s (2000) naming of the ‘Anthropocene’ has provoked lively debate across the physical and social sciences, but, while the term is gradually gaining acceptance as the signifier of the current geological epoch, it remains little more than a roughly defined place-holder for an era characterized by environmental and social uncertainty. The term invites deeper considerations of its meaning, significance, and consequences for thought and politics. For this Forum, we invited five scholars to reflect on how the Anthropocene poses challenges to the structures and habits of geography, politics, and their guiding concepts. The resulting essays piece together an agenda for geographic thought – and political engagement – in this emerging epoch. Collectively, they suggest that geography, as a discipline, is particularly well suited to address the conceptual challenges presented by the Anthropocene.